One enterprise deal, five integrations
Their identity provider, their data warehouse, their ticketing system. Each one is a few weeks of a senior engineer who is currently shipping the thing you sold last quarter.
You have dates in front of customers and a hiring pipeline that will take a quarter. We add senior backend and frontend engineers to your team. You interview them, they work the same hours as your team, in your repository, in your sprint, with access to your systems from day one.
It is the work that has to happen first, that nobody on the team wants, and that no one has time to scope.
Their identity provider, their data warehouse, their ticketing system. Each one is a few weeks of a senior engineer who is currently shipping the thing you sold last quarter.
A framework two major versions behind, or a schema change that has been deferred four times. It blocks three other items and never wins a planning argument.
Refunds, plan changes, merging two accounts that are the same customer. Every one of those needs an admin tool that was never built, so it needs an engineer instead.
Code review, on-call and interviews fill the calendar of exactly the two people whose output the roadmap assumed. Adding a junior makes that worse before it makes it better.
Allocation, rate and notice period go in writing before anyone starts. Each service has its own page.
A product team does not need a second methodology. It needs people who fit the one that exists.

You interview them, the same way you would interview any candidate, and you say no to anyone who is not right. You get the people you met, and if someone has to change we tell you ahead of time and hand over properly. The full terms are on the team augmentation page.
That depends on your codebase, and the honest version is that it depends most on how fast access and a first ticket arrive. We plan for a small, real piece of work in the first days instead of a reading week, and we ask your team for the one person who can unblock questions.
You do. Project-specific code and documentation are yours as defined in the contract, and the work lives in your repository from the first commit, which means the handover is finished before anyone asks for it.
Then it is a project, not an allocation, and we price it per phase with the scope written down first. That fits a bounded piece such as an admin console or a migration. Where the work is a stream of roadmap items, an allocation is the cheaper shape for you.
Tell us what is committed, what is blocking it and what your stack looks like. We reply within one to two business days to set up a first call with the engineers, not with an account manager.
Let’s talk about your roadmap