Se abre en una pestaña nueva
Industries · SaaS

Engineering capacity for SaaS teams with a committed roadmap

You have dates in front of customers and a hiring pipeline that will take a quarter. We add senior backend and frontend engineers to your team. You interview them, they work the same hours as your team, in your repository, in your sprint, with access to your systems from day one.

Where the roadmap stalls

The blocker is rarely the hard feature

It is the work that has to happen first, that nobody on the team wants, and that no one has time to scope.

01

One enterprise deal, five integrations

Their identity provider, their data warehouse, their ticketing system. Each one is a few weeks of a senior engineer who is currently shipping the thing you sold last quarter.

02

The migration nobody scheduled

A framework two major versions behind, or a schema change that has been deferred four times. It blocks three other items and never wins a planning argument.

03

Support is doing database work

Refunds, plan changes, merging two accounts that are the same customer. Every one of those needs an admin tool that was never built, so it needs an engineer instead.

04

Your seniors spend the week reviewing

Code review, on-call and interviews fill the calendar of exactly the two people whose output the roadmap assumed. Adding a junior makes that worse before it makes it better.

What is different here

We join the process you already run

A product team does not need a second methodology. It needs people who fit the one that exists.

  • 01Your ceremonies, your board. Standup, planning, retro and whatever tracker you use. Status lives on your board, where your team already looks for it.
  • 02Your definition of done. Tests, review standard, staging and release process as your team already runs them. Work lands through pull requests your engineers approve.
  • 03Access on your terms. Scoped to what the work needs, granted by you, revocable by you. Where you have a SOC 2 program, we work inside its controls and give you the evidence it asks for.
  • 04Capacity that moves. Allocation goes up for a release and down after it, with the notice period agreed in advance so neither side is guessing.
Engineers working in a shared repository alongside a client product team
FAQ

What engineering leads ask before they commit

Let’s talk about your roadmap

You interview them, the same way you would interview any candidate, and you say no to anyone who is not right. You get the people you met, and if someone has to change we tell you ahead of time and hand over properly. The full terms are on the team augmentation page.

That depends on your codebase, and the honest version is that it depends most on how fast access and a first ticket arrive. We plan for a small, real piece of work in the first days instead of a reading week, and we ask your team for the one person who can unblock questions.

You do. Project-specific code and documentation are yours as defined in the contract, and the work lives in your repository from the first commit, which means the handover is finished before anyone asks for it.

Then it is a project, not an allocation, and we price it per phase with the scope written down first. That fits a bounded piece such as an admin console or a migration. Where the work is a stream of roadmap items, an allocation is the cheaper shape for you.

Next step

What is the next thing on your roadmap with a date on it?

Tell us what is committed, what is blocking it and what your stack looks like. We reply within one to two business days to set up a first call with the engineers, not with an account manager.

Let’s talk about your roadmap